Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
In cost-effectiveness acceptability curves probabilities for cost-effectiveness, compared with standard care, ranged from 89% to 93% for SOD and from 63% to 72% for SDD, for acceptable costs for 1 LYG ranging from €0 to €20 000.
Similar(59)
The authors also considered that the cost effectiveness of eplerenone was below a "threshold" for acceptable cost effectiveness of $US50 000 per life-year gained (Weintraub et al. 2005).
In Norway, common practice uses a threshold value of NOK 500,000 for acceptable cost per quality-adjusted life year gained [ 11].
However, compared to best supportive care, the most cost-effective strategy, CT followed by laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasound, achieved an ICER of $87 502, being well above most thresholds for acceptable cost per life-year gained.
Although higher payments have been found to result in bigger effects [ 62, 63], in the present study we have chosen a maximum of 30 euro's on average per month because (1) patients could get used to or become financially dependent on higher payments or even lose their social security benefits and (2) to strive for acceptable cost-utility of M4M.
The explicit quantification of acceptable costs for a given benefit is difficult to define.
These estimates remain well within the range of acceptable costs.
It is therefore not possible to use the IQWiG-benchmark for valuing novel drugs [ 43] and to extrapolate the ICER of the most effective current treatment as a benchmark for an acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio for a novel device.
Beyond this, acceptable costs for the market are decisive for the introduction of PVD technologies into production.
Architectural management can be defined as an ordered way of thinking which helps to realise a quality building for an acceptable cost or as a process function with the aim of delivering greater architectural value to the client and society.
However, for whom should breast MRI surveillance be employed and what are acceptable costs?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com