Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The case for a negative answer lies in the predictive power of the core natural sciences compared with even the most highly developed social sciences.
One might have thought that Kelsen would have opted for a negative answer here.
While this is non-negotiable for physical terms, it is an open question for mental terms, and Davidson will be arguing (4) for a negative answer.
The scoring of the responses was done by assigning to "Strongly Agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree" the scores 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively, for a positive answer to a positive item and the scores 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, for a negative answer to a negative item.
Similar(56)
Many advocates of federal financing for embryo-destructive research begin from a negative answer to that question.
We are grateful to Aisling McCluskey for bringing up this issue and to Jorge Bruno [6] for providing a negative answer.
For stroke observations providing a negative answer but reporting the age for when their relative(s) got the disease were given a positive response (n=2).
We show that the similarity problem for A(G) has a negative answer if and only if there is a bounded representation of A(G) which is not completely bounded.
This question receives a negative answer for some semantical systems, and a positive answer for others.
In my joint work with Wajnryb [104] the DEF = DIFF question was shown to have a negative answer also for simply connected surfaces (indeed for some of the families of surfaces constructed in [82]).
However, we show that, in principle, this question has a negative answer and, for this reason, we delve into the study of fixed point techniques in asymptotic complexity analysis of algorithms.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com