for a confrontation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for a confrontation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a situation or event that is intended to lead to a conflict or disagreement between parties. Example: "The two leaders met for a confrontation regarding their differing policies."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Hayes braced for a confrontation.

The New Yorker

He's not looking for a confrontation.

The New York Times

The activists are headed for a confrontation.

The New York Times - Magazine

The groundwork was laid for a confrontation of unprecedented proportions.

The New York Times

"We are not looking for a confrontation," he said.

Independent

Unprepared for a confrontation, the authorities backed down.

The New York Times

I am not simply looking for a confrontation".

The New York Times

By March 1981, the Klan arrived in Meriden looking for a confrontation.

Yale University

"We're not looking for a confrontation with the Obama administration," he said.

The New York Times

He got to the top, primed for a confrontation, finding none.

The New York Times

Mr. Putin, Mr. Trenin said, "is gearing up for a confrontation down the road".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for a confrontation", ensure the context clearly indicates the expectation or preparation for conflict, not just a discussion or meeting. For example, "The troops were deployed for a confrontation at the border" clarifies the intent more effectively than "The diplomats met for a confrontation".

Common error

Avoid using "for a confrontation" when the situation is intended to be a peaceful discussion or negotiation. This phrase implies an expectation of conflict, which can misrepresent the actual intent. Use alternatives such as "to discuss", "to negotiate", or "for a meeting" to convey a neutral purpose.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for a confrontation" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase that often modifies a verb, noun, or adjective, indicating the purpose or intended outcome of an action. As Ludwig AI confirms, it suggests preparing or intending for a conflict.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for a confrontation" is a prepositional phrase used to indicate preparation or intention for conflict. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage across various contexts, particularly in News & Media and Academia. When using this phrase, ensure the context clearly implies an expectation of conflict, and be mindful of potential misinterpretations in neutral situations. Consider alternatives such as "seeking a conflict" or "preparing for a showdown" when a more neutral tone is needed. By understanding its nuances and appropriate contexts, writers can effectively use "for a confrontation" to convey anticipation or readiness for conflict.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

gearing up for a showdown

Emphasizes the preparation and readiness for a decisive encounter.

seeking a conflict

Focuses on the act of actively searching for a contentious encounter.

preparing for a showdown

Focuses on the act of making preparations for a decisive event or contest.

setting the stage for a conflict

Highlights the preparatory actions that create the conditions for a dispute.

primed for a battle

Highlights the state of being fully prepared and eager for a conflict.

in anticipation of a clash

Highlights the expectation and preparation for a future disagreement.

inviting a confrontation

Suggests behavior that is likely to provoke a contentious situation.

courting a clash

Implies actions that invite or risk a conflict.

bracing for a collision

Emphasizes the act of preparing oneself for an impending conflict or disagreement.

readying for a dispute

Highlights the act of getting prepared for a disagreement or argument.

FAQs

How can I use "for a confrontation" in a sentence?

You can use "for a confrontation" to indicate preparation or anticipation of a conflict, such as "The activists marched to the government building /s/in+anticipation+of+a+clash target="_blank" rel="nofollow">in anticipation of a clash with the police" or "The company lawyer was preparing /s/gearing+up+for+a+showdown target="_blank" rel="nofollow">gearing up for a showdown with their rival".

What are some alternatives to "for a confrontation"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "/s/seeking+a+conflict target="_blank" rel="nofollow">seeking a conflict", "/s/gearing+up+for+a+showdown target="_blank" rel="nofollow">gearing up for a showdown", or "/s/preparing+for+a+showdown target="_blank" rel="nofollow">preparing for a showdown".

Is it correct to use "for a confrontation" in a business context?

Yes, it is appropriate if the situation involves anticipated conflict or strong disagreement. For instance, "The CEO was /s/readying+for+a+dispute target="_blank" rel="nofollow">readying for a dispute with the shareholders over the new policy". However, avoid it for routine meetings or negotiations where conflict isn't expected.

What is the difference between "for a confrontation" and "for a discussion"?

"For a confrontation" implies an expectation of conflict, disagreement, or opposition. In contrast, "for a discussion" suggests a more neutral exchange of ideas or information without the expectation of conflict. If a more neutral intent is appropriate, prefer /s/courting+a+clash target="_blank" rel="nofollow">courting a clash over confrontation.