Sentence examples for for a balanced comparison from inspiring English sources
The phrase "for a balanced comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the need to evaluate two or more items or ideas in a fair and equitable manner.
Example: "When analyzing the two products, it's essential to present the features and drawbacks for a balanced comparison."
Alternatives: "for an equitable assessment" or "to ensure a fair evaluation".
Incorporating these perspectives to existing modelling approaches to predict long-term demographic consequences of alterations in fishing effort and gear selectivity (e.g. Kvamme and Kuldbrandsen Føysa 2004) might provide a platform for a balanced comparison of ecological, evolutionary and economical impacts of alternative fisheries management strategies.
To avoid filling out the same form over and over again and to make comparison even simpler, look for a site that provides a balanced comparison.
In order to make a balanced comparison, one can look, for example, at the beginning of 1995, where the average real price of Asian and European cars was roughly the same, around (12,000) euros.
26 Secondly, several features aided in establishing a balanced comparison group, including the requirement for diagnoses of mental disorder with high propensity for treatment with stimulants and the broad selection of variables for propensity score adjustment.
It's not a balanced comparison.
To enable a balanced comparison of the accuracy between SRSM and MC, the same number of uncertainties are used for each moment model.
Using the appropriate D-error measurement alone does not provide a balanced comparison.
This analysis uses population-based data in Asian and non-Asian centres to allow for a more balanced comparison.
For a more balanced comparison, Hocking et al. (2013) showed that DNAcopy breakpoint detection can be improved by picking an undo.SD parameter which minimizes breakpoint annotation error (we did not apply smoothing before segmentation, and we kept default values for all other parameters).
We replicated Green (2007) using his asymmetrical method, but otherwise we found the WMT and TOMM produce comparable failure rates in samples at-risk for exaggeration with balanced comparison (three TOMM subtests vs. three WMT).
Rather than aiming for a study population with "balanced" comparison groups with the same number of participants in each, we included all eligible participants, thus decreasing confidence intervals and increasing statistical power [ 42].
