The standard errors ranged from 0.28 to 0.92, indicating that all the parameters were accurately estimated [ 37].> -wrap-foot> Abbreviations: χ /df, Relative chi-square; CFI, Comparative fix index; GFI Goodness-of-fit index; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation Footnotes Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out using LISREL version 8.8 for Windows.
cUnconditional logistic regression analyses adjusted for cohort and age at sampling in addition to all factors in footnote b. dMeasured in post-menopausal women only.
cAdjusted for cohort in addition to all factors in footnote a. 25(OH D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; CI, confidence interval; NSMSC, Northern Sweden Mammary Screening Cohort; NYUWHS, New York University Women's Health Study; ref, reference.
†Final model included only vaccination as independent variable (see footnote to table 2); adjustment factors were considered important if P<0.05 or estimates were changed by 10%.
Compared with white women, African-American and Asian/Pacific Islander women were non-significantly more likely to develop breast cancer after adjustment for other factors (see table footnote).
Table 2 shows associations between square root transformed PMD and breast cancer risk, comparing cases to sister controls and unrelated controls, adjusting for the risk factor shown in the Footnote to the table.
The MQ reflects the requirements of the product information for non-prescription sumatriptan and naratripan as subjects with three or more cardiac risk factors (see Table 6 footnote) are considered unsuitable for a triptan.
Objectively-measured risk factor – see Table 2 footnotes for descriptions.
The ICCs, adjusted for the factors shown in the Footnote to Figure 3, were all statistically significant, and similar to the Pearson correlations for cases and sister controls.
The ICCs, adjusted for the factors shown in the Footnote to Figure 2, were all statistically significant but were smaller than the corresponding Pearson correlations.
