Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"foolish enough to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe someone who is particularly foolish. For example, "He was foolish enough to trust the wrong people."
Exact(60)
"Nobody would be foolish enough to take this job".
So nobody in Detroit is foolish enough to declare victory.
Few employers today are foolish enough to mandate discrimination.
I was young and foolish enough to do just that.
The fact that Congress was foolish enough to create the fiscal cliff doesn't mean it also has to be foolish enough to drive us off it.
Not that Lendl is foolish enough to blithely speak of change.
I am not foolish enough to think I have made a final decision about marriage.
He will gamble that the Russian people are foolish enough to trade prosperity for nationalistic fervour.
It's hard to believe that Michele Bachmann would be foolish enough to sign this pledge".
Under these circumstances, why would the nominee be foolish enough to reply as Ms. Greenhouse suggests?
Who would be foolish enough to build a boat out of cardboard?
More suggestions(25)
foolish enough to engage
foolish enough to point
foolish enough to abandon
foolish enough to reply
foolish enough to say
foolish enough to cite
foolish enough to defy
foolish enough to foul
foolish enough to stay
foolish enough to attempt
foolhardy enough to
preposterous enough to
idiotic enough to
empty enough to
ridiculous enough to
unwise enough to
ignorant enough to
irresponsible enough to
misguided enough to
silly enough to
dumb enough to
insane enough to
mindless enough to
absurd enough to
crazy enough to
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com