Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
following two years
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "following two years" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the two years that come after a specific point in time or event. Example: "The project will be evaluated in the following two years to assess its impact."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Science
Wiki
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
Other subjects will be replaced over the following two years.
News & Media
These must normally be spent in the following two years.
Encyclopedias
SSE warned it will get tougher to achieve increases in earnings in the following two years.
News & Media
But it expects those numbers to rise sharply in the following two years.
News & Media
The design of the Stars and Bars varied over the following two years.
Encyclopedias
Adams remained the central figure of the Continental Congress for the following two years.
Encyclopedias
But in the following two years, Old Virginia has roared back.
News & Media
The figure for the following two years was yet to be filled in.
News & Media
The stimulus package, announced in November, promised 4 trillion yuan, or $585 billion, in spending over the following two years.
News & Media
The Bank continues to expect global economic activity to grow modestly in 2013 before strengthening over the following two years.
News & Media
Over the following two years the anti-abuse commission has seen attempt after attempt to undermine it.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "following two years", ensure the context clearly establishes the starting point to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of "Sales increased in the following two years", specify "Following the product launch in 2023, sales increased in the following two years."
Common error
Avoid using "following two years" without a clear reference point. Saying "The company expanded in the following two years" is vague. Instead, specify "The company expanded in the following two years, after the initial investment in 2023".
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "following two years" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb or noun, specifying a time frame succeeding a specific point. Ludwig confirms its correct usage across numerous contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
39%
Wiki
17%
Science
15%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
10%
Formal & Business
6%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "following two years" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to denote a period of two years after a given point. As confirmed by Ludwig, it functions as a prepositional phrase to provide temporal context. It is versatile across various registers, being common in neutral and formal communications, particularly in news, encyclopedias, science, and business. While sources like The Guardian and The New York Times frequently employ the phrase, clarity is paramount: always ensure the reference point is clear to avoid ambiguity. Using alternatives like "subsequent biennium" can enhance formality, but directness is key to effective communication. This phrase is generally free of errors and can be easily integrated into almost any writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
the two years after
Direct and simple, focusing on temporal sequence.
the after two years
Directly indicates the period succeeding a specific timeframe, albeit slightly less common in usage.
next couple of years
More casual and implies a less precise timeframe.
ensuing two years
Slightly more formal, highlighting the consequence or result.
subsequent biennium
More formal and emphasizes a period of two years.
the subsequent 24 months
More precise, using months instead of years.
the two years thereafter
More formal, emphasizing the time that follows.
the coming two years
Similar to 'next couple of years', but with a slightly more formal tone.
in the wake of two years
Emphasizes events that happened after a period of time.
the approaching two years
Focuses on anticipation of the coming time period.
FAQs
How can I use "following two years" in a sentence?
Use "following two years" to refer to a period of two years after a specific event or time. For example, "After the merger, the company restructured in the following two years".
What is a more formal alternative to "following two years"?
A more formal alternative is "subsequent biennium", especially in official reports or academic writing. However, ensure the context warrants such formality.
Is there a difference between "following two years" and "next two years"?
While similar, "following two years" usually implies a specific starting point has already been mentioned, while "next couple of years" is more general and forward-looking from the current time.
Can I use "in the following two years" and "during the following two years" interchangeably?
Yes, "in the following two years" and "during the following two years" are often interchangeable. Both indicate that something happens within that two-year period. For example, "Improvements were made in the following two years" or "Improvements were made during the following two years".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested