Sentence examples for following grades from inspiring English sources

The inclusion of items pertaining to the preceding and following grades was used to confirm the difficulty of each item.

The following grades of JSN were defined: grade 0 = normal; grade 1 = minimal but definite narrowing (25% JSN); grade 2 = moderate narrowing (50% JSN); grade 3 = severe narrowing (75% JSN); grade 4 = obliteration of the joint space, 'bone on bone but no attrition'; grade 5=<5 mm attrition of subchondral bone and grade 6=≥5 mm bone attrition.

The following grades of cataract were used: 0 – transparent lens; 1 – very light cortical or nuclear opacity in the lens (corresponding to the decimal scale of the standard 1-4); 2 – opacity zones (corresponding to the decimal scale of the standard 5-8); 3 – intensive cortical or nuclear opacity of the lens (corresponding to the decimal scale of the standard 9-10).

The following grades of JSN were defined: grade 0=normal; grade 1=minimal but definite narrowing (25% JSN); 2=moderate narrowing (50% JSN); 3=severe narrowing (75% JSN); 4=obliteration of the joint space, "bone on bone but no attrition"; 5=< 5 mm attrition of subchondral bone and 6=≥ 5 mm bone attrition [ 3].

For example, following Chisholm (1989: 16), it might be proposed justification for a belief might come in the following grades: (1) probable, (2) epistemically in the clear, (3) beyond reasonable doubt, (4) evident, (5) obvious, and (6) certain.

The research involved samples of polymer composite materials (plate size 150 mm × 200 mm) of the following grades: carbon fibre mark VKU-39 (reinforced of brand Porcher fibres), thickness 3 mm; carbon fibre mark KMU-4E, thickness 5 mm; fibreglass mark VPS-33, thickness 5 mm.

The entire tumour section was assessed and analysis was carried out on a quantitative basis with the following grading applying throughout: −: no staining; positive staining was scored follows: + : 5 25%; +++ : 25 50%; ++++ : >50 75%; +++++ : >75 100%.

A previous meta-analysis by Philips et al. [6] ultimately advised against surgical treatment following grade III acromioclavicular separation.

They suggested that the rationale of surgical reconstruction to achieve anatomic alignment for full functional recovery may not always be achieved following grade III acromioclavicular separation [8].

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients managed operatively and non-operatively following grade III acromioclavicular dislocation.

The authors were asked to write texts that would be a complete and coherent text and also be part of the text presented in the following grade.