The phrase "following argumentation" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It refers to the reasoning or line of thought that is presented or followed in a discussion or debate. Example: "The speaker presented a compelling case for their proposal, backed by thorough research and following solid argumentation." In this sentence, "following argumentation" means that the speaker's reasoning was sound and logically presented.
In addition the following argumentation highlights the role of local interactions, as compared to the mixed case.
The following argumentation might explain that, despite these seemingly different effects, area 44 has the same role for selecting semantic and phonological information in the mental lexicon.
They find that judicial expertise is necessary when creditors are biased, using the following argumentation: When creditors are biased towards liquidation, a more debtor-friendly bankruptcy law in which management is allowed to retain some control will be efficient.
Following argumentation as outlined above, one would expect that breast tumors that are ERα positive, but Basal type by BluePrint analysis, would either have a very low level of ERα protein or harbor a defective ERα protein.
As regards the question on the intention of mobility partnerships in Europe's future it is quite clear that the European migration policy, following the argumentation and analysis described earlier in the text, represents a very restrictive regime.
When assessing whole-part correlations, e.g. between individual date of arrival at the breeding sites and the time difference between the arrival at the breeding site and the local spring green-up, we avoided any artificial restriction to positive r-values following the argumentation of [ 39, 40].
The proposed approach is designed to scaffold the following aspects of argumentation: the argumentation process, the explanation structuring, explanation construction, and explanation evaluation.
It appears likely, following this line of argumentation, that the profound reductions of GC-derived memory and (in parallel) of RF-producing B cells 6, 9, and 12 months after RTX were therapeutically relevant and linked processes.
Evaluation of xOLM (n = 10), which has a complex method of interaction following the Toulmin (1959) argumentation patterns, was found to require some time for participants to gain sufficient familiarity.
This content will be exemplified by referring back to the following case of doctor patient argumentation based on the study by Rubinelli [ 38]: Doctor: Take this antibiotic.
The content of this training course was not developed following one specific approach to argumentation.
