followed later

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "followed later" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to indicate that something occurred after a previous event or action. Example: "The meeting was scheduled for 10 AM, followed later by a lunch discussion." Alternative expressions include "subsequently" and "afterward."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Elsa followed later.

The New York Times - Books

The emir followed later.

The Guardian

Guernsey and Jersey followed later still.

The Guardian - Sport

The money from the other donor would have followed later.

The Guardian

Israel, followed later by the PLO and Jordan, reject it.

The Economist

Off the sister went; a younger sister followed later.

The Economist

Estonia followed later in the month and Latvia in May.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Over 50 students came to the first session, and a second quickly followed later that summer.

Yale University

Next morning, the phone calls started early, the letters followed later.

The Guardian - Books

The relaunch could be followed later by a new consumer version.

The Guardian - Tech

The two divorced that September, and Anzor returned to Russia; his ex-wife followed later.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "followed later", ensure clarity by specifying the time frame or context to avoid ambiguity. For example, "The initial presentation was well-received, followed later by a lively Q&A session."

Common error

Avoid mixing tenses when using "followed later". Ensure the preceding and following actions are in a consistent tense. Incorrect: "He presented the report, followed later by she publishes the findings." Correct: "He presented the report, followed later by her publishing the findings."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "followed later" functions as a temporal marker, indicating the sequence and timing of events. As Ludwig AI suggests, this construction serves to link one action or occurrence to another that happens at a subsequent time. It provides a chronological relationship between the two events.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Encyclopedias

15%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Science

13%

Academia

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "followed later" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase to indicate the chronological order of events with a time delay. As Ludwig AI underlines, this expression is appropriate across various contexts, from news and media to encyclopedic entries, maintaining a neutral register. To ensure clarity, it's best to specify the time frame when using this phrase. Related alternatives include "came afterwards" and "ensued subsequently". Avoiding tense inconsistencies is a crucial best practice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

came afterwards

Focuses on the temporal sequence but with a stronger emphasis on the subsequent event.

ensued subsequently

Emphasizes the immediate consequence of a preceding action or event.

occurred thereafter

Highlights the chronological order of events, suggesting a formal tone.

happened next

Simplifies the expression, making it more suitable for informal settings.

came on the heels of

Implies close proximity in time and a direct connection between events.

resulted after

Highlights the cause-and-effect relationship with a focus on the outcome.

progressed from there

Emphasizes the development or advancement from a particular point.

arose in the aftermath

Indicates events that unfolded as a result of a significant occurrence.

transpired eventually

Stresses the final outcome after a period of time or a series of events.

unfolded down the line

Suggests a progression of events occurring at a later, unspecified time.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "followed later" in a sentence?

You can use alternatives like "subsequently", "afterwards", or "thereafter", depending on the context and desired formality.

What's the difference between "followed later" and "followed by"?

"Followed later" indicates a time delay between two events, while "followed by" simply indicates a sequence. For instance, "The speech was followed later by a reception" suggests a gap in time, while "The speech was followed by a reception" implies the reception occurred immediately after.

Is it correct to say "was followed later"?

Yes, "was followed later" is grammatically correct. It's the passive voice construction of "followed later", often used when the subject of the action is more important than the actor. For example, "The initial announcement was followed later by a detailed report."

Can "followed later" be used at the beginning of a sentence?

While less common, "followed later" can be used at the beginning of a sentence for stylistic effect, particularly when emphasizing the sequence of events. However, it's often better to rephrase for clarity. Example: "Later, the band was followed by an orchestra" might be more clear than "Followed later, the band was by an orchestra"