Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

followed for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "followed for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the duration or period during which something has been followed or adhered to. Example: "The guidelines have been followed for several months to ensure compliance with the new regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Adam followed for stamping on Craig Dawson.

More disappointment followed for Ravitch.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Worse followed for Arsenal.

Worse followed for Celtic.

A difficult period followed for the church.

More trouble followed for Melo.

News & Media

The Guardian

More frustration followed for Ronaldo.

The group was followed for 16 years.

News & Media

The New York Times

Worse might have followed for England.

Better results followed, for a while.

Their health was followed for 4.1 years.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a study or experiment, clearly state the duration for which subjects or data were "followed for" to provide context for the findings.

Common error

Avoid stating that something was "followed for" without specifying the exact duration. This lack of clarity reduces the informative value of your statement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.3/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "followed for" functions as a verb phrase indicating the duration of an observation or monitoring period. Ludwig shows examples where it describes the timeframe in studies or experiments. Ludwig AI confirms it's grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "followed for" is a grammatically sound verb phrase used to specify the duration of an observation or monitoring period. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness. It is commonly employed in scientific and news contexts. Remember to always specify the duration when using this phrase and consider using alternatives like "observed for" or "monitored for" depending on the nuances you wish to convey. The phrase appears less often in formal or business settings.

FAQs

How can I use "followed for" in a sentence?

Use "followed for" to indicate the duration over which something or someone was observed or monitored. For example, "The patients were "followed for 12 months" to assess the treatment's long-term effects."

What's the difference between "followed for" and "observed for"?

"Observed for" and "followed for" are similar, but "observed for" typically implies a passive observation, while "followed for" can suggest a more active tracking or monitoring process.

What can I say instead of "followed for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "monitored for", "tracked for", or "studied for".

Is "followed for" grammatically correct?

Yes, "followed for" is grammatically correct and commonly used to indicate a period of observation or monitoring. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is usable in written English.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.3/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: