Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
H1b The majority of apprentices have already found a follow-up solution at the fourth measurement point.
According to Heim et al. (2012), approximately 5% of commercial apprentices in the Canton of Bern interrupt training without a follow-up solution within the same field.
Furthermore, the author found that one-third of the apprentices had a follow-up solution three months before completing the training.
Slightly less than 60% of apprentices had a follow-up solution after finishing their training and more than 80% of them planned to remain employed within their training company.
Whereas Seeber (2013) found that only one-third of commercial apprentices in Germany had a follow-up solution 2 3 months before graduation, in our study, this number was nearly 60% (confirmation of hypothesis H1b).
In alignment with Seeber (2013) as well as Wicki and Kraft (2013) we assume that the majority of apprentices intend to remain within the occupation and have already found a follow-up solution two to three months before completing the apprenticeship training.
Similar(52)
Comparing the follow-up solutions between the profiles, a significant Chi-square test was found: X 2 (1) = 21.289; p < .01.01
As Wicki and Kraft (2013) found, apprentices in the M-Profile were more often in the category of follow-up solutions than the E-Profile apprentices were.
What is the status quo regarding remaining intentions, follow-up solutions and further education plans at the end of commercial apprenticeship training (measurement point 4), and are there any profile-related differences?
First, we aim to report (a) the status quo of commercial apprentices initial career aspirations, (b) their intention to remain within the occupation, (c) their further education intentions and (d) the prospects of follow-up solutions after completing training.
What is the status quo regarding remaining intentions, follow-up solutions and further education plans at the end of commercial apprenticeship training (measurement point 4), and are there any profile-related differences? .
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com