Given that sensations are non-resembling and non-representational (they are mere patterns of local motions) it follows that ideas, which are essentially representational, could not be derived from them.
So, from the fact that the formal reality of object B is the cause (or origin) of an idea's objective reality, it will not follow that this idea represents object B. One way to read this is that the veracity of God guarantees the truth of NC.
If this were so, and if (as again seems obvious) we do understand the idea or concept of a physical or material object, then it would follow that this idea or concept is not about trans-experiential objects, but can only be about some feature or aspect of experience itself.
The soul must always be in commerce with the senses, and although our thoughts depend on the corporeal traces in the brain for their source or origin, it does not follow that our ideas must be corporeal, or even similar to corporeal things.
Netflix's Jessica Jones follows that idea to its logical conclusion: its superheroine doesn't have a silly name, certainly doesn't dress up in tights, and would in general much rather be doing something else.
Following that idea, immense amount of effort has been devoted to the development of collaborative computer-aided design (CAD) systems, and process frameworks that drive those systems.
Following that idea, this paper analyzes the hypothesis that ensembles can be especially appropriate in problems that: (i) suffer from distribution changes, (ii) it is possible to characterize those changes beforehand.
Following that idea, which is particularly interesting now with the emerging computational nano-sciences, it is stressed here that a full set of isomorphisms can be established between the fundamental logical principles and the information flows, Hamiltonian or dissipative, in phase space.
So it would follow that the authorities have some idea of who the organizers are.
