Sentence examples for fodder p from inspiring English sources

The average oocyst counts were significantly lower in birds fed with the AB28-expressing pea seeds than in animals receiving conventional fodder (P = 0.038).

The results presented in Figure 7c demonstrate very significant reduction of caecal oocyst counts in the birds fed with the AB28-containing fodder (P = 0.002).

Where Y = the natural log of the probability of participating in fodder production (P), divided by the probability of not participating (1 − P).

Cows fed fodder had lesser (P < 0.05) milk protein production but greater (P < 0.05) milk urea N. Income over feed costs favored not feeding fodder except when cracked corn prices increased by 50% over those used in the study.

Households that adopted fodder production had significantly (p < 0.05) smaller average land sizes (13.73 ± 16.81 hectares) than non-producers who had averagely larger land sizes (19.72 ± 23.29 hectares).

The results showed that in the study areas, fodder producers were significantly (p < 0.01) more educated with mean of 9.14 ± 3.99 years of education than non-producers whose mean years of education was 5.80 ± 4.13.

The study demonstrated that the fuelwood and fodder consumption was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in winter (lean period) as compared to that in summer and monsoon seasons.

In addition to this, C. fetus herd infection was associated with a further reduction in PrCR of 8.4%.> Herds that gave fodder and bran were associated with 6.5% higher PrCR (P = 0.044) and herds that gave concentrate with 7.9% higher PrCR (P = 0.037) than herds that did not.

Herd size was found to have positive and significant (p < 0.05) relationship with adoption of fodder production, indicating that households with large herds have higher probability of adopting fodder production than those with smaller herds.

Gender of the households' head had a positive and significant (p < 0.05) influence on households' participation in fodder production, implying that male-headed households are more likely to participate in fodder production than those headed by females.

Participation in a social group and access to extension and training services showed positively significant (p < 0.01) influence on households' participation in fodder production.