focus to include

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "focus to include" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete expression and lacks clarity in its intended meaning. Example: "We need to focus to include all relevant stakeholders in the discussion."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

We are extending the focus to include Rome statute crimes already in our jurisdiction.

The Guardian

Here Mr. Parnell widens the focus to include discussion of the supernatural.

The New York Times

It has broadened its focus to include other alleged instances of animal abuse.

The Guardian

As President, she expanded her focus to include globalization and the environment.

The New Yorker

However, I challenge journalists to expand their focus to include the less privileged members of a diverse community.

The New York Times - Style

Morgenstein says that the company has expanded its focus to include developing more family-oriented fare for film.

The New Yorker

Lawyers who defend companies in asbestos lawsuits say plaintiffs are just broadening their focus to include companies with cash.

The New York Times

But he made up for it by shifting the focus to include more moderate-size companies, he said.

The New York Times

But he gamely tries to widen his focus to include at least a bit of the British viewpoint.

The Economist

Later sections widen the focus to include athletes, soldiers and other local heroes who are now obscure.

The New York Times - Arts

Without easing the outrage over Darfur — where the bloodshed has been particularly appalling lately — we must broaden the focus to include the threat to the south.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and grammatical correctness, replace "focus to include" with alternatives such as "expand the focus to incorporate" or "broaden the scope to encompass".

Common error

Avoid using "focus to include" in formal writing. While common, it lacks grammatical correctness. Opt for more precise and grammatically sound alternatives to enhance clarity and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "focus to include" functions as an infinitive phrase expressing the intention or purpose of broadening or expanding the scope of something. However, according to Ludwig AI, it is grammatically incorrect and should be replaced with more appropriate alternatives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

39%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "focus to include" is frequently used, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. It is intended to express the expansion of attention or scope to incorporate additional elements. Despite its common occurrence in diverse sources, including News & Media, Science, and Business, opting for grammatically sound alternatives like "expand the focus to include", "broaden the scope to encompass", or "shift attention to encompass" is recommended for clarity and precision in writing. For formal or professional writing it is recommended to prefer correct and more precise alternatives. Remember that there are a lot of more appropriate terms you can use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

expand the focus to incorporate

It substitutes "include" with "incorporate", emphasizing a more integrated inclusion.

broaden the scope to encompass

This alternative replaces "focus" with "scope" and uses "encompass" instead of "include", indicating a wider coverage.

widen the lens to consider

It uses "lens" as a metaphor for focus and "consider" in place of "include", suggesting a deeper evaluation.

shift attention to encompass

Attention is shifted, and "encompass" emphasizes the comprehensive nature of the inclusion.

extend the analysis to consider

It suggests expanding the analysis to consider new factors.

adjust the perspective to cover

It implies a change in viewpoint to ensure all aspects are covered.

redirect efforts to integrate

It focuses on a redirection of effort to integrate something into the existing framework.

modify the strategy to add

It suggests a change in strategy that includes adding something new.

reshape the plan to introduce

The plan is reshaped to introduce a new element.

reorient the viewpoint to present

The viewpoint is reoriented to include presenting something to the audience.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the idea of "focus to include" in a sentence?

While the phrase "focus to include" is commonly used, it's grammatically incorrect. Instead, use phrases like "expand the focus to include", "broaden the "scope to encompass"", or "shift the "attention to encompass"".

What are some alternatives to "focus to include"?

Some alternatives include "expand the focus to incorporate", "widen the "lens to consider"", "redirect efforts to integrate", or "extend the analysis to consider".

Is it better to say "focus to include" or "focus on including"?

The phrase "focus on including" is grammatically correct. Using "focus to include" is considered incorrect, so using "focus on including" is better or using alternatives phrases with similar intent and meaning.

How does "expand the focus to include" differ from "focus to include"?

"Expand the focus to include" is a grammatically correct way to express the idea of broadening one's perspective or area of attention. "Focus to include" is considered grammatically incorrect, making "expand the focus to include" the preferable option.