Exact(14)
As the bees approached this first constriction point, the larger optic flow sum increased.
The first constriction was encountered at position x = 73 cm (Figure 4C, arrowhead n°3), whereas the larger optic flow sum (Max(Σω45°) ) occurred at x = 82 cm.
We therefore observed that the larger optic flow sum was stabilized (Figure 4B 4D) thanks to the decrease and the increase of the honeybees' speed.
The second constriction occurred at position x = 135 cm (arrowhead n°4), whereas the larger optic flow sum (Max(Σω45°)) occurred at x = 137 cm.
The larger optic flow sum first changed from lateral to vertical and from vertical to lateral just before reaching the points where the minimum section changed.
The larger optic flow sum increased slightly as the tunnel narrowed and tended to reach a similar value to that recorded before the constriction point.
Similar(45)
There was a lack of attacking flow, summed up by a weak final in which Italy barely had a shot in the first half and France played with Henry up on his own.
The larger of the two optic flow sums perceived increased until the honeybee reached the constriction.
In reducing their speed, honeybees maintain the larger of the two perceived optic flow sums at a relatively constant value (Figure 4B 4D).
Analysis of the larger of the two optic flow sums showed that their variance was lower at an angle of 45° than at 90°.
Consequently, it is the plane (horizontal or vertical) affording the larger of the two optic flow sums that will constrain the bee's speed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com