Sentence examples for flow of reasoning from inspiring English sources
The phrase "flow of reasoning" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the logical progression or coherence of thoughts in an argument or explanation.
Example: "The author's flow of reasoning was clear and persuasive, making it easy for readers to follow the argument."
Alternatives: "line of thought" or "train of thought".
Drucker engages the reader by a tour de force of reflection but convinces him, if at all, by a tone of responsible authority and a commonsense flow of reasoning.
Using specific passages from many of Drucker's books, the author demonstrates how Drucker's broadly contextual, logical, holistic play of thought enacts a kind of ongoing drama of perspective and how, combined with his fair-minded approach and commonsense flow of reasoning, Drucker so effectively convinces the reader.
Following an in-depth review of existing studies and the factors that influence decision-making, the flow of reasoning in the process is defined and the relations among the parameters of the whole life cycle to be considered in the conceptual design phase are established.
Having outlined the content of each column, the following provides an example of the flow of reasoning for one particular type of intervention underpinned by elements of the model.
Sixty-nine percent of students represented genetic variation and 60% represented phenotypic variation, but only 53% of students' midterm models illustrated a direct flow of reasoning (possibly including "protein" as intermediate structure) from the specific allele/genotype to the corresponding phenotype.
However, arc arrowheads on a BBN do not show the direction of flow of information during reasoning (as in neural networks or rule-based systems), because information can be propagated both forwards and backwards.
Instead of trying to construct a coherent chain of reasoning in Flew's own words, the authors present a case that often consists of an assemblage of reassuring sound bites excerpted from the writings of scientists, popularizers of science and philosophers.
In this study, we used targeted active-learning activities to help students improve their ways of reasoning about carbon flow in ecosystems.
Logic models typically adopt a left to right flow of "if....then" propositions to illustrate the chain of reasoning underpinning how interventions lead to immediate (or short term) outcomes and then to longer term outcomes and impacts.
This paper presents a theory that supports commonsense, qualitative reasoning about the flow of liquid around slowly moving solid objects; specifically, inferring that liquid can be poured from one container to another, given only qualitative information about the shapes and motions of the containers.
Our tools suggest improvement in form, spelling, and grammar reasonably well, but are helpless when it comes to logical structure, reasoning, and the flow of ideas.
