Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

flooded with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "flooded with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is often used to describe a situation in which something is in high demand or abundant. For example, "The market was flooded with customers looking to take advantage of the sales."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Philadelphia has been flooded with sewage.

News & Media

The Economist

The Internet has been flooded with suggestions.

News & Media

The New York Times

The screen flooded with red and green.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The house was flooded with light.

News & Media

The New York Times

The magazine was flooded with entries.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Paris was flooded with enterprising Russian émigrés.

News & Media

The New York Times

Mr. Murphy was flooded with panic.

News & Media

The New York Times

The country becomes flooded with illegal immigrants.

News & Media

The New York Times

The rooms were flooded with light.

News & Media

The New York Times

The office was soon flooded with complaints.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Freddie's face flooded with relief.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "flooded with", ensure the subject receiving the abundance logically connects to the noun that is abundant. For example, "The office was flooded with applications" makes sense because offices can receive applications.

Common error

Avoid using "flooded with" in overly passive constructions where the agent causing the flooding is unclear or omitted. Instead of "Mistakes were flooded with the report", specify who or what caused the mistakes to become abundant: "The report was flooded with mistakes" or "The editor flooded the report with mistakes."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "flooded with" functions as a prepositional phrase that typically modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating that something is present in a large or excessive quantity. Ludwig's examples show it describing tangible and intangible things, like "rooms" or "complaints".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "flooded with" is a versatile and commonly used prepositional phrase to describe an abundance or being overwhelmed. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and appropriate for various contexts, particularly in News & Media. When writing, make sure that you are matching with the above written Writing Guidance to avoid most common errors. Consider alternatives like "inundated with" or "awash in" for nuanced meaning. Be mindful to use "flooded with" in active voice for clarity. Overall, using "flooded with" effectively enhances descriptive writing and provides a strong sense of quantity or prevalence.

FAQs

How can I use "flooded with" in a sentence?

Use "flooded with" to describe a situation where something is present in great abundance. For example, "The market is "flooded with content"" or "The office was "flooded with complaints"".

What are some alternatives to "flooded with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "inundated with", "awash in", or "teeming with".

Is it appropriate to use "flooded with" in formal writing?

Yes, "flooded with" is appropriate for both formal and informal writing. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability, and it appears in reputable news sources and business publications.

What's the difference between "flooded with" and "filled with"?

"Filled with" generally suggests a state of being completely occupied, while "flooded with" implies an overabundance or overwhelming quantity. For example, a room can be "filled with" people, but a website might be "flooded with" traffic.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: