Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "flooded of" is not grammatically correct in written English.
It is possible that it may be used in spoken language in certain dialects or informal settings, but it would still be considered incorrect. Instead, one could say "flooded with" or "flooded by" to indicate that something or somewhere has been filled with a large amount of water. Example: The basement was flooded with water after the heavy rainstorm. or The low-lying areas were flooded by the overflowing river.
Exact(2)
The study sites included shrub/grass, young (< 15 years) and mature (> 80 years) riparian forests that were either flood-protected (FP), occasionally flooded (OF) or frequently flooded (FF).
The classifier is first applied to the whole time series to map the maximum and minimum flood extent by defining 3 flood conditions: never flooded (NF); occasionally flooded (OF); permanently flooded (PF).
Similar(57)
Subways flooded, thousands of houses became rubble.
High tides flooded portions of Nassau.
The heavy rains flooded parts of LaGuardia Airport.
Los Angeles County had a host of flooded roadways.
Dozens of homes flooded.
Flood of Fire.
A flood of imitations followed.
And floods of tears.
It's a flood of changes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com