Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
When comparing the individual ethnic groups, results are presented as IRRs and 99% floating confidence intervals (FCIs).
For the 5557G>A polymorphism where there was more than two genotypes, 95% floating confidence limits (FCIs) were also computed as suggested by Easton et al (1991).
When comparing the individual ethnic groups, we use 99% floating confidence intervals (FCIs), calculated using the method of floating absolute risks, which enable valid comparisons between any two groups, even if neither one is the baseline (Easton et al, 1991; Plummer, 2004).
Similar(57)
This approach yields floated standard errors and floated confidence intervals (Easton et al, 1991; Plummer, 2004).
This approach yields floated standard errors (FSE) and floated confidence intervals (FCI).
The RRs were treated as floated absolute risks [23] when more than two categories were used for risk comparisons, and given with corresponding floated confidence intervals (FCIs), so that valid comparisons can be made between any two groups.
Where analyses involve risk comparison across more than two categories, variances were estimated by treating the RRs as floating absolute risks (Easton et al, 1991) and results are, therefore, presented in the form of relative risks and their corresponding floated confidence intervals.
Floating 95% confidence intervals for the IRR categorised according to the number of CT scans were calculated using the amount of information in each category.
The method of floating absolute risks leads to confidence intervals that are approximately independent and are therefore readily interpreted (Plummer, 2004).
In Figure 2, because more than two groups were compared, variances were estimated by treating the relative risks as floating absolute risks, yielding group-specific confidence intervals (g-s CI) (Easton et al, 1991).
The TL reduction in IS (RS) participants corresponded to the reduction in control participants -.167/-.00657 = 27.9 (-.184/-.00657 = 27.9) years older (slight differences due to floating point arithmetic and rounding), bootstrapped 95% confidence interval 13.9-58.6 (13.9-58.6).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com