Sentence examples for flexible score from inspiring English sources

A few Icebreaker members joined the All-Stars and others in a realization of Mr. Riley's masterpiece, whose flexible score accommodates any ensemble that plays it.

For the combination of the two kinds of Gabor features, we prefer a more flexible score level fusion as opposed to a feature level fusion, which needs to address the heterogeneity of various features, and a decision level fusion, which involves less information [34].

This yields a very flexible scoring scheme that can be readily applied to any intragenic or intergenic feature of the genome targeted by a sufficient number of probes.

Besides its speed, one principal advantage of the RAF meth-odology is its use of a flexible scoring function for combining an arbitrary set of functions into a coherent objective function for alignment scoring.

A more flexible scoring system could more easily identify subgroups for the identification of very high risk patients eligible for novel chemotherapy approaches such as high-dose chemotherapy or the use of novel cytotoxic agents (Bokemeyer et al, 1999; Kollmannsberger et al, 2000).

If one is interested in filtering a large list of nominally significant findings (p < 0.05) to identify a subset most worthy of follow-up, instead of characterizing the evidence for a single finding, our flexible scoring system can be utilized in this setting as well.

Seven subjects were each provided with eight plant stems of different properties (see Fig.  1b), ranging from green and flexible ('material score' 1) to woody and rigid (score 8), with the two stems in the middle of the range (scores 4 and 5; 'control' and 'matched' stems) matched as closely as possible (for details, see Methods).

In Otello the drama is absorbed into a continuous and flexible musical score vastly advanced in style over that of Aida, reflecting every aspect of the characters and every nuance of the action.

The investigators noted that the flexible Framingham score provides for use of different thresholds of risk, which is important when tolerability may vary according to the clinical situation.

It is a powerful and flexible weighed scoring decision-making process to help people set priorities and make the best decision when both qualitative and quantitative aspects of a decision need to be considered.

The method of Navarro (2004) is more flexible in scoring and applies to both simple patterns and regular expressions, but is much slower than our method in practice.