Sentence examples for flexible cases from inspiring English sources

For the three patients who were older than 8 years, soft tissue procedures were selected since the recurrent deformities were classified as flexible (cases 3, 9 of Table 1) (Fig. 4) or had already talonavicular arthritis and the treating surgeons decided to gradually correct the deformity by soft tissue distraction alone and to withhold the option of a triple fusion for the future (case 2).

Moreover, in 32% of flexible cases (28% overall), steric clashes would prevent ligand binding in the absence of movements.

Overall, in 32% of flexible cases (28% of all binding sites), side-chain rearrangements are required to accommodate the ligand and to avoid steric clashes.

Results on the all, rigid and flexible cases for our and other tested methods are also reported in Figure 4, in which our method shows the highest stability (little difference in prediction performance).

Predictions made with our combined contacts and NIS model (Model 6, Equation 2) are much less sensitive to conformational changes than all previous models, with only minor differences in performance between rigid (i_rmsd ≤ 1.0 Å, R = −0.75 and RMSE = 1.88 kcal mol−1) and flexible cases (i_rmsd > 1.0 Å, R = −0.73 and RMSE = 1.89 kcal mol−1).

When only rigid cases (interface RMSD between superimposed free and bound components ≤1.0 Å, red triangles) are considered, the correlation increases to R = −0.75 (ρ < 0.0001) with a RMSE of 1.88 kcal mol−1, while for flexible cases (interface RMSD >1.0 Å; yellow rhombus) R = −0.73 (ρ < 0.0001) with a RMSE of 1.88 kcal mol−1.

However, the general flexible case is still an open problem.

This appearance could be attributed to back-folding of some of the repeat units in the flexible case and to a branching angle effect in the stiff case.

As for the flexible case, property of spectrum division multiplexing technology and bandwidth limitation of the ring based switches should be taken into consideration during allocation of the central module, such that the system throughput can be maximized.

We find for the most flexible case P(ϕ j | Γ f ) = 1/6 an entropy of H(Γ f ) = log2 6).

For instance, the improvement in WAIT for group L1 is 9.85 min in the Flexible case and 10.35 min in the Rigid case.