Sentence examples for flawed paper from inspiring English sources

Despite agreeing the consensus exists, Tol nevertheless tried to find fault in our approach, and as a result submitted a flawed paper.

It was not the first time that the process had failed, but it was the most severe case" In another possible example, a new journal called Climate published a fundamentally flawed paper by Syun-Ichi Akasofu that used unphysical magical thinking to try and blame global warming on natural causes.

Science contributing correspondent John Bohannon went undercover to map out which journals used peer review in evaluating a fatally flawed paper, and he shares his findings in this week's special science communication issue.

Finally, we categorised papers as either: a 'key paper'conceptuallylly rich and could potentially make an important contribution to the synthesis'); a satisfactory paper; a paper that is irrelevant to the synthesis; a methodologically fatally flawed paper [ 22].

Flawed Paper Maps As utility crews try to restore power on Long Island, they are hindered by an antiquated record system that consultants have repeatedly criticized, according to interviews and state reports.

The first approach is a common one in which a fundamentally flawed paper makes it through the peer-review process into a credible journal.

His concerns about scientific publishing grew as he studied several flawed papers that had been yanked from high-profile journals.

To identify fatally flawed papers, we used the criteria in Table 1, adapted from those proposed (at the time of our review) by the National Health Service NHS National Electronic Library for Healthth for the evaluation of qualitative research, to inform judgements on the quality of the papers.

Strategies that appear flawed on paper to game experts can actually disorient human masters.

Lu's paper fits into Category 2 of the ways flawed contrarian papers get published in scientific journals – by submitting to an off-topic journal.

Furthermore, in terms of quality appraisal and to identify fatally flawed empirical papers (which in a realist review differs from the methodological approach of a systematic review), we decided to assess the five prompts suggested by Dixon-Woods et al for all studies: (i) Are the aims and objectives of the research clearly stated?