"flawed criteria" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it whenever you want to refer to standards or regulations that are defective or inadequate. For example: "The flawed criteria used in the selection process meant that the best candidates were not chosen."
Finally, this was a protest against the unrealistic brevity of the appeal process and the flawed criteria by which the affected companies can appeal.
Journalists have also protested what they said were flawed criteria used to choose top editors for state-owned newspapers, saying those selected were either sympathetic to the Brotherhood or pliant holdovers from the Mubarak government.
They are seeking a ruling that the regulations rely on flawed criteria which narrow the definition of domestic violence too far and wrongly impose a strict 24-month time limit on the evidence a person can use to show they were victims entitled to aid.
So, if you're using flawed criteria to begin with, you're perpetuating incorrect diagnoses.
Critics say the government review, coordinated by the National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes (ANVUR) at the Ministry of Education, University and Research is using flawed criteria and will do little to reward the best Italian scientists.
There were a number of innovative features in the response, including relatively rapid registration and verification based on flawed criteria, and the use of smart cards for distributing cash assistance.
This analysis included a "fatal flaw" criterion, which would reject recommendations that failed to meet standards of cost, technical feasability, etc.
This approach is flawed because other criteria than the specific type of procedure performed may limit ambulatory use: the patient's clinical condition, other associated procedures.
> -wrap-foot> 2 Study meets criterion to a high standard, 1 study partially meets criterion, 0 flawed or the relevant information was not stated, X no or not stated, S self-reported outcome measure, P psychoacoustic outcome measure Randomisation is the preferred or 'gold standard' design in therapeutic or 'effectiveness of an intervention' research [ 46, 51, 52].
But there has been no research to date that has directly studied the one concern driving all of these criticisms — that the premise of the evaluation criteria is flawed.
However, the methodological quality of the testing procedures for all instruments was flawed, when considering the methodological criteria applied in this review.
