The magnitude observed for the other types is larger than those found with more extended RIASEC inventories: additional items probably help to flat gender differences to some extent, although it is difficult, if not impossible, to avoid the previously described gender patterns (Fonteyne, Wille, Duyck, and De Fruyt, 2016).
In all examined groups regardless of gender, flat foot reaches the level of 14.5 % in the left foot and 8.9 % in the right one.
In addition, we find little evidence that these effects vary substantially by recipients' net assets, subjective financial preparedness for retirement, flat-type, or gender.
In general, the effect does not seem to vary substantially by recipients' flat-type or gender, though there is suggestive evidence that SSS recipients who are more financially prepared for retirement/have higher income may spend more on health-related consumption (results available on request).
There does not appear to be a clear pattern in how transfers received and given by SSS recipients change over time (Table 5), and the effect does not appear to vary substantially by recipients' net assets, subjective financial preparedness for retirement, flat-type, or gender (results available on request).
The majority of the results of the analyses that address the diversity of flat foot occurrence depending on gender proves that this dysfunction is more prevalent among boys than girls [ 3, 5, 23, 27].
In all gender and obesity level groups, the flat foot was more common among boys than among girls.
The advent of sleek flat screens began to shrink the gender gap.
The influence of gender and age on flat foot incidence has also been analyzed.
The irony is that, when we look at the facts, we find the perspective of gender bias to be flat-out irrational.
A smirking Serb of indeterminate gender, wearing a tailcoat, sang flat, hiccupping now and then for dramatic effect.
