Sentence examples for flames of outrage from inspiring English sources
Now any ill-advised photographs or posts on those sites are fair game for critics, who can fan the flames of outrage with posts of their own.
3.37pm BST An Iranian member of parliament said Wednesday that a strike on Syria would fan "flames of outrage... toward the Zionist regime".
Iranian lawmakers and commanders issued stark warnings to the United States and its allies on Tuesday, saying any military strike on Syria would lead to a retaliatory attack on Israel fanned by "the flames of outrage".
"In case of a U.S. military strike against Syria, the flames of outrage of the region's revolutionaries will point toward the Zionist regime," the semiofficial Fars news agency quoted Mansur Haqiqatpur, an influential member of Parliament, as saying on Tuesday.
Publicly, former Enron executives say little about the company because their lawyers have cautioned them not to fan the flames of outrage over the collapse and perhaps further complicate their legal cases.
Mansur Haqiqatpur, an influential member of the Iranian Parliament, was quoted by the semiofficial Fars news agency as saying, "In case of a U.S. military strike against Syria, the flames of outrage of the region's revolutionaries will point toward the Zionist regime" — Iran's derogatory term for Israel.
They reversed themselves Wednesday only after feeling the full flame of outrage from the public and New Jersey officials demanding to know why an ambitious sports program, financed by taxpayers, sought to protect Coach Rice in his reprehensible behavior, and at a salary announced at $650,000 a year when he was hired in 2010.
Each party charged the other with fanning the flames of public outrage for political gain.
Day in and day out, Al Jazeera deliberately fans the flames of Muslim outrage.
Indeed, as Sarah Maza shows in her excellent new book, "Violette Nozière: A Story of Murder in 1930s Paris," it only fanned the flames of public outrage against her.
The problem, say those who have fanned the flames of popular outrage this week, is that the book suggests that the father of modern India was bisexual.
