Sentence examples for flames compared with the from inspiring English sources

The driving factors in the model responsible for the quite different soot predictions in the ethylene and butene flames compared with the methane flame are benzene and acetylene concentrations, which are higher in the ethylene and butene flames.

Conditional averages with respect to strain for displacement and consumption speeds are presented over a wide range of strain typically encountered in a turbulent flame, compared with previous studies that either made local pointwise comparisons or conditioned the data on small strain and curvature.

We conducted a series of laboratory-scale fire whirl experiments spinning 5-cm-diameter methanol pool fires and observed elongated flame height compared with the pool fire without spin.

The heat transfer characteristics of non-swirling flame jet are compared with the swirling flame jets for various mixture compositions.

A scaling law is proposed that gives the steady-state turbulent flame velocity in the regime where the flame is thin compared with the largest scale of the turbulence, diffusion effects are small compared to the fluid dynamics effects, and the turbulence is driven by the Rayleigh-Taylor instability in a gravitational field.

The rate of OH reaction with soot in the midregion of the flame was small compared with the rate of reaction of OH with CO.

The vertical H-atom number density profiles measured along the burner centerline for various flame equivalence ratios were compared with the results of a numerical flame calculation using the UNICORN (Unsteady Ignition and Combustion with Reactions) code.

The compositions with the addition of 60% flame retardant waste showed a reduction of 85% in flame propagation times when compared with the samples without the addition of fire retardants and this was accompanied by increased mechanical resistance.

Their flame retardant effect was compared with the previously used acrylate phosphate and phosphonate monomers.

The research was conducted to assess the performance of two kinds of flame resistant asphalt mixture compared with the control mixture in laboratory.

It is further seen that the CEMA-based adaptive modeling strategy more accurately predicts the ignition delay time and flame lift-off length compared with the low-cost flamelet models such as TFM and FPV, while the computational cost is substantially lower compared with the well-mixed combustion model using finite rate chemistry.