flagrant violation of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "flagrant violation of" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe a very obvious or blatant breaking of a rule or law. Example: The company's CEO was accused of a flagrant violation of ethical standards for using company funds for personal expenses.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"This is a flagrant violation of privacy," said the representative.

Independent

"This is a flagrant violation of privacy," they told Buzzfeed.

Independent

His conduct was a flagrant violation of biosafety standards.

The New York Times

"It's an outrageous and flagrant violation of the landmarks law".

The New York Times

A spokesperson for Lawrence said at the time: "This is a flagrant violation of privacy.

Independent

A spokesperson for Lawrence said: "This is a flagrant violation of privacy.

Independent

They presumably realized that the world would denounce their flagrant violation of international law.

The New York Times

Russia's foreign ministry decried "a flagrant violation of the right to peaceful assembly".

The Economist

Jennifer Lawrence's representatives called the leak "a flagrant violation of privacy".

Independent

The UNHCR said at the time that the expulsion was "a flagrant violation of international law".

The Guardian

In addition, Panama's National Legislative Council condemned the transfer as a "flagrant violation" of the treaty.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "flagrant violation of", ensure the context clearly establishes the rule or law being broken. This adds precision and impact to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "flagrant violation of" for minor infractions. This phrase implies a severe and blatant breach, so reserve it for situations where the violation is truly egregious.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "flagrant violation of" functions as a noun phrase that describes an action or situation that blatantly disregards a rule, law, or standard. As Ludwig AI explains, it is grammatically sound and widely recognized. Examples from Ludwig show its usage in legal, ethical, and international contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

15%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "flagrant violation of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to describe a blatant breach of rules or laws. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and wide acceptance. It is commonly found in news, academic, and formal contexts, signaling strong disapproval. When using the phrase, ensure the context clearly indicates the rule being broken and that the violation is indeed severe. Alternatives like "outrageous violation of" or "brazen violation of" can be used to express similar meanings with slightly different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

flagrant infraction of

Uses 'infraction' as a synonym for 'violation', slightly softening the tone.

egregious violation of

Highlights the exceptional and remarkably bad nature of the violation.

outrageous violation of

Emphasizes the shocking and unacceptable nature of the violation.

brazen violation of

Highlights the boldness and shamelessness of the violation.

severe violation of

Focuses on the gravity and seriousness of the violation.

manifest violation of

Emphasizes the clear and easily perceived nature of the violation.

scandalous violation of

Indicates that the violation has caused public outrage and disrepute.

evident violation of

Similar to 'obvious violation', stressing the clear visibility of the violation.

obvious violation of

Stresses the clear and undeniable nature of the violation.

apparent violation of

Indicates that the violation is seemingly true or real.

FAQs

How can I use "flagrant violation of" in a sentence?

You can use "flagrant violation of" to describe a blatant and obvious breach of a rule, law, or agreement. For instance, "The company's actions were a /s/flagrant+breach+of contract."

What are some alternatives to "flagrant violation of"?

Alternatives include "outrageous violation of", "brazen violation of", or "egregious violation of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct: "flagrant violation of" or "flagrant violations to"?

"Flagrant violation of" is the correct phrasing. "Flagrant violations to" is grammatically incorrect. Ensure you use the preposition "of" to connect the adjective and noun.

What's the difference between "flagrant violation of" and "minor infraction of"?

"Flagrant violation of" implies a severe and obvious breach, while "minor infraction of" suggests a small, less significant rule-breaking. The former carries a much stronger connotation of wrongdoing.