flagrant foul

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "flagrant foul" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in sports contexts to describe a serious or blatant violation of the rules, often resulting in a penalty. Example: "The referee immediately called a flagrant foul after witnessing the aggressive play that endangered the opposing player."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Francis received a flagrant foul.

The New York Times - Sports

"Was it a flagrant foul?

The New York Times

Brown was called for a flagrant foul.

The New York Times - Sports

That's a flagrant foul in my book.

The New York Times

Did Sprewell's flagrant foul cross the line?

The New York Times - Sports

Martin was assessed a Level 2 flagrant foul, which is a flagrant foul with excessive contact.

The New York Times - Sports

Upon review, it was reduced to a Flagrant Foul One.

The New York Times - Sports

"I wasn't trying to flagrant foul him," he said.

The New York Times - Sports

Atlanta Coach Lon Kruger called for a flagrant foul then.

The New York Times - Sports

Whitmore was charged with a flagrant foul and ejected.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Smith was assessed a flagrant foul-2 and ejected.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a "flagrant foul", be specific about the action that constituted the foul and the potential impact on the player involved.

Common error

Avoid using "flagrant foul" interchangeably with terms like "technical foul" or "personal foul". A "flagrant foul" specifically implies excessive or unnecessary contact that could cause injury.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "flagrant foul" functions as a noun phrase typically used as a subject or object within a sentence. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and common usage. The phrase denotes a serious violation of rules, particularly in sports, involving excessive or unnecessary contact.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Wiki

8.33%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "flagrant foul" is a common and grammatically sound term, primarily used in sports reporting to describe a severe infraction involving excessive or unnecessary contact. Ludwig AI validates the correctness and usability of the phrase. Predominantly found in News & Media sources, its usage is neutral to professional, aiming to categorize and communicate the seriousness of the foul. Alternative phrases include "intentional foul" and "excessive contact foul", each highlighting different aspects of the infraction. The phrase is most accurately used when describing dangerous and unnecessary contact, avoiding confusion with other types of penalties.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

blatant foul

Indicates that the foul was obvious and unmistakable.

intentional foul

This term specifies that the foul was committed on purpose.

excessive contact foul

Focuses on the physical aspect and intensity of the foul.

unsportsmanlike foul

Emphasizes the violation of sportsmanship ethics.

dangerous foul

Highlights the potential for injury caused by the foul.

reckless foul

Suggests the foul was committed without regard for the safety of others.

aggressive foul

Describes the forceful nature of the foul.

malicious foul

Suggests the foul was committed with harmful intent.

severe infraction

Broader term indicating a serious violation of rules, not limited to sports.

flagrant violation

This emphasizes the 'violation' aspect rather than the specific 'foul'.

FAQs

How is a "flagrant foul" different from a regular foul?

A "flagrant foul" /s/flagrant+foul involves unnecessary or excessive contact that is deemed dangerous, while a regular foul is a more common violation of the rules during play.

What are the consequences of committing a "flagrant foul"?

The consequences for a "flagrant foul" /s/flagrant+foul can include free throws for the opposing team, possession of the ball, and potential ejection of the player who committed the foul.

What's the difference between a "flagrant foul" type 1 and type 2?

A "flagrant foul" type 1 is unnecessary contact, while a "flagrant foul" type 2 is unnecessary and excessive contact. A type 2 foul typically results in immediate ejection from the game.

What can I say instead of "flagrant foul"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "intentional foul", "excessive contact foul", or "unsportsmanlike foul".