Sentence examples for fixation variability from inspiring English sources

Furthermore, left vs. right eye does not account for any variation of the within fixation variability (see Table  4).

The mean fixation variability μ is relatively stable across tasks and individuals (see Tables  1 and 4).

There are significant differences between tasks in fixation variability, although these account for only 5% of the variability in the x-direction and 8% in the y-direction.

Moreover, our calculations show that there are no significant correlations in our data between the differences in LGN activation and either the degree of fixation variability or the degree of eccentric fixation.

Furthermore, except for the mean horizontal movement of the left eye during reading, parameter estimates of the linear mixed effects model show that these mean fixation variabilities are not significantly different from zero.

Furthermore, for some individual-task combinations we find extremely high within-fixation variability of the POR.

In study 1, we found that the mean of the within-fixation variability was not significantly different from zero.

The figure illustrates that differences in within-fixation variability are substantially larger between individuals than between tasks.

To determine fixations, it uses velocity thresholds based on the natural within-fixation variability of both eyes.

As illustrated in Fig.  1, within-fixation variability varies strongly across individuals leading to very different control ellipses.

However, there are substantial differences of the within-fixation variability of the POR across individuals and tasks (SD = 7.84 in x-direction and SD = 1.51 in y-direction).