Sentence examples for five judgements from inspiring English sources

In only five judgements (three cases) did the difference have an effect on the survival outcome: four times the consensus score resulted in 'failure of the restoration' and once in 'success'success

Four of the five judgements concerned the diagnosis of dentine carious lesions, which resulted in three failures.Using the FDI criteria, the evaluators differed in six of 242 judgements for fractures and retention, in 27 of 242 judgements for marginal adaptation, in 13 of 242 judgements for wear and in five of 242 judgements for tooth integrity, before reaching consensus.

The three judgements cast into doubt the evidence of two experts - Sir Roy Meadow and Dr Alan Williams - who testified for the prosecution in each case, says the Mirror.

According to this refined view, a predication is made not by combining two ideas or presentations, but by combining two judgements.

What distinguishes it from the first two is once again the neustic which will reflect that this judgement is a universal prescription to bring about P. This means that we cannot compute the logical compatibility or incompatibility of two judgements by noting the compatibility or incompatibility of their phrastics which we are treating as their contents.

In its 12 years, the court had made only three judgements, two guilty: Thomas Lubanga and Germain Katanga, both convicted of war crimes in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The two judgements were then averaged and dichotomised (see Table 1).

Making the two judgements of adversity and doing okay to identify resilience is not specific to the idea of bouncing back; they can equally relate to keeping going.

The correlation coefficient, however, is just an indicator of a linear relationship, but not one of agreement (in the sense that two judgements are identical).

In only six judgements (four cases) differences had an effect on the survival outcome; four times the consensus score resulted in success and twice (two cases) in failure of the restoration.

Critically, there was again a significant interaction between ∆BMIi and judgement type (F1,5553 =4.02, p = 0.04), showing that there are differences in the effect of ∆BMIi on the two judgements.