RAQoL, HADS, HAQ-DI: Linear regression analysis will fitted to the change in QoL scores between baseline and 6 months including the minimisation factors and baseline DAS28 in addition to treatment.
Logarithmic models were fitted to the change in annualising factors with recall time (R=0.89 for medically attended injuries, 0.98 for non-medically attended injuries), and were used to predict the correction factor for 2-year recall; 2 for medically attended injuries and 3.8 for non-medically attended injuries.
Results were evaluated by calculating Pearson correlation coefficient and linear fits to the log2 fold change ratios.
An exponential curve was fitted to the temporal changes in hydraulic conductivity, as both a function of water potential or soil water content, with a high degree of fit.
(2) The orientation of SHmax coincides with the orientation of the minor axis of an ellipse fitted to the relative change of shape of the borehole cross-section during the deformation.
Thus, we have introduced a parameter F (= (a − b /a) of the nominal flattening of the ellipse fitted to the relative change of the borehole shape as the degree of borehole deformation, where a and b are the lengths of the major and minor axes, respectively.
Regression results from a model fitting to the percent change in number of cells as a function of principal cell populations (frequency >1%%) and drugs (Marker and Drug variables) are shown in Additional file 5: Table S2 and the results of post hoc tests for percent change between cell populations are shown in Additional file 5: Table S3.
b d ETAS models (1) and (2) fitted to the datasets until the change-point (the dashed vertical line) with M c = 1.0, M c = 1.5, and M c = 2.0, respectively.
Then, for the two basic stimulation conditions, with inhibition as well as with addition of antioxidants the dynamics and fit to the data is not changed (see also Additional file 2).
At discharge from the rehabilitation program, all models showed high fit to the changes in the dependent variables attaining explained variances of between 53.3% and 61.6% (Table 1).
