Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
You've probably heard the phrase "when the face doesn't fit", describing an individual who finds him or herself in a tricky workplace situation.
The Freundlich isotherm was found to be the best fit describing the experimental data, suggesting that adsorption occurred on a heterogeneous surface.
The regression analysis for the parameter 90% circle diameter and pain intensity was a poor fit, describing just 18.7% of the variance in circle diameter (Radj = 16.5%).
In all cases, the regression was a poor fit describing between 8 and 22% of the variance (Radj between 8 and 20%), but the overall relationship was significant (P<0.0001) in all cases.
For mean velocity and pain intensity, the regression analysis was a reasonably good fit, describing 53.0% of the variance in mVel ML and 40.0% in mVel AP (Radj = 51.0% and Radj = 38.4% respectively), the overall relationship was highly significant in both ML and AP direction (F = 40.8, p < 0.001 and F = 24.9, p < 0.001 respectively).
Similar(55)
Overall the negative power and logarithmic fit describes well the T2m-EVI relationship by ecoregion in both OBS and projected climate, indicating the strongest warming over the driest ecoregions.
The solid red line is a model fit described below, and intercepts 100% polarization at ∆E = 38 meV, corresponding to twice the MoSe2 LA phonon energy of 19 meV from the literature25.
Following an exponential fit described previously, the transient for the H3 + formation channel indicates a time constant of 119 ± 3 fs while the H2D+ formation channel has a larger time constant of τ = 244 ± 25 fs.
Subsequent to a similar exponential fit described previously, ethanol and 1-propanol exhibit formation times a factor of 2.3 ± 0.2 longer than for methanol, while the formation time for H3+ from 2-propanol only increased by a factor of 1.9.
The low energy component is estimated from the Maxwellian fit described in Section 3.1.
The F test of lack of fit describes the variation of the data scattering the fitted model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com