Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
A total of 72 children (ages 7 14 years) participated in the investigation: 36 children (19 female, 17 male) tested FISH positive for chromosome 22q11.2 deletion (Mean age = 10 years 9 months, ± 2 yr 4 mo) and 36 were age-matched typically developing controls (13 female, 23 male; Mean age = 10 years 6 months, ± 1 yr 11 mo).
Similar(59)
Tissues from 128 (62%) patients were FISH-positive for EGFR, including 37 (18%) with gene amplification and 91 (44%) with high polysomy.
In the present study, we did not identify a correlation between EGFR and HER2 protein expression and gene copy number in gastric carcinomas: only 7 cases showed co-expression of EGFR and HER2, and 3 cases were simultaneously FISH-positive for EGFR and HER2.
We found that for fishing, the socioeconomic impacts of MPAs were generally perceived as negative for industrial fishing and positive for artisanal fishing.
Although all individual fish tested positive for brevetoxin by ELISA and/or LC-MS/MS, only the striped mullet concurrently tested positive for DA as well.
The samples taken from affected fish were positive for ISAV.
At 2 wpi, 5 out of 6 fish were positive for viral RNA in heart (median of relative copy number = 20.5 fold, Figure 2a).
All endothelial cells in the tumor mass of ptena +/−ptenb −/− fish stained positive for pGSK-3 (Fig. 4C), whereas endothelial cells in a control vessel in the same section only stained weakly positive for pGSK-3 (Fig. 4D).
Interestingly, the proportion of fish testing positive for IHNV in brain decreased from a high of 45%% immediately following the cessation of morbidity (195 dpc) to < 3.8 % at the time of the initiation of the microarray study (274 and 278 dpc).
The RT PCR analysis of 29 of the 50 FISH-positive cases for which RNAs were available verified that 14 (44.8%) cases possessed the KIF5B RET fusion and 2 possessed the CCDC6 RET fusion.
In the current study seven out of eight fish species sampled from fish ponds proved positive for V. cholerae.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com