Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(11)
Pure-code signals 'in plain hearing' have the advantage of being much faster than the first two techniques. .
It is generally accepted that the first two techniques include both the radiating and non-radiating noise sources while the last senses only the radiated sound.
The first two techniques corroborate the chemical structure via the identification of some polymer characteristic groups, and the last one was performed to verify the presence of silver nanoparticles into the system.
The first two techniques are measuring the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) using the slim-tube displacement and the rising bubble apparatus (RBA) (Dong et al. 2001; Elsharkawy et al. 1992; Ghorbani et al. 2014; Kazemzadeh and Riazi 2013).
Finally, a rule-based, output feedback control, implemented with fuzzy logic, is coupled with a nonlinear feed-forward approach, and is examined under the same conditions applied to the first two techniques.
The first two techniques obtain dual-energy data simultaneously at two different energy levels at typically 80 and 140 kVp, although dual-source systems can also operate at 100 and 140 kVp (with an additional tin filter) in case of larger patient sizes.
Similar(49)
Details regarding the techniques, and applications and results of the first three techniques are available in the literature and will not be reiterated here.
Only one of the first three techniques can be employed during any SDR analysis, while ( alpha 4 ) is an inclusive technique adopted for detecting overwhelming static pattern occurrences that cannot be detected by the other three.
Note that despite the names of the first five techniques listed, they are not universally taught in numeric order.
Only the first two chemosterilant techniques are approaching practical application, and their safety aspects require detailed evaluation and assessment.
We first consider two techniques that do not consider burstiness.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com