Let p have two elements, as in the first row of Table 3.
The derived parameters are listed in the first row of Table 1.
The feature candidates are listed in the first row of Table 2.
We depict the corresponding power law fit parameters in the first row of Table 1.
The logistic cost was more than two P2D and SPD functions that presented in the first row of Table 2.
No capacitor bank is present in the collection grid; therefore, the first row of Table 6 should be used.
Results are shown in the first row of Table 1 in terms of SNR gain after separation.
The first row gives the matching effects from the first row of Table 8, but now adding the share of the total graduation gain.
Figure 2 and the first row of Table 1 show location and tests of differences for all vessels in the sample.
The first row of Table 5 shows the SER obtained when the noisy unprocessed speech is recognized using multi-style trained recognition models.
It is observed that the standard deviation of all four jammers differs significantly as indicated by the first row of Table 4.
