first line of criticism

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "first line of criticism" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the initial or primary point of critique regarding a subject or issue. Example: "The first line of criticism against the policy was its lack of transparency."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The first line of criticism is characteristic of those who defend some sort of non-cognitivism (e.g. Stevenson, Ayer, Hare, Blackburn, and Gibbard), while the second is often embraced by naturalistically inclined cognitivists (e.g. Railton, Boyd, and Brink).

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

However, it was the third line of criticism, that which sought to control the sultan, that was most important.

Encyclopedia Britannica

A fourth line of criticism says that the Fed will hamper growth in foreign economies by driving down the value of the dollar.

The New York Times

But whites are made perfectly welcome when they attend.The second line of criticism is aimed specifically at Jeremiah Wright, Trinity's pastor, who will retire this year.

The Economist

A second line of criticism targets the alleged perceptual priority of P-properties.

SEP

A third line of criticism attacks the rationale for assigning a low number to \(p(F\mid \neg D \).

SEP

A second line of criticism disagrees with the intuition that different belief ascriptions are true of the physically identical subjects in the two environments.

SEP

(See also Segal (2000).) A third line of criticism (Loar (1988), Patterson (1990)) concedes that different belief ascriptions are true of the physically identical subjects, but denies that this implies externalism.

SEP

"They're my first line of defense".

The New York Times

Retention is the first line of defence.

The Economist

Sold first line of stuffed animals 1986.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When introducing a series of criticisms, use "first line of criticism" to clearly mark the beginning of the critique and guide your audience through your argument. This helps structure complex discussions and ensures clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "first line of criticism" when simply stating a general opinion without providing specific evidence or analysis. This phrase implies a structured critique, not just a casual remark.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "first line of criticism" functions as a discourse marker, signaling the beginning of a critical analysis or evaluation. It sets the stage for presenting an initial objection or counterargument. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "first line of criticism" serves as a valuable tool for structuring critiques and introducing initial objections. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. Its neutral register and common usage across news, science, and encyclopedic sources make it suitable for various contexts. While alternatives like "initial point of critique" and "primary criticism" offer similar meanings, "first line of criticism" effectively signals the start of a structured critical evaluation. Remember to follow it with specific evidence and analysis for maximum impact. Avoiding its use when simply stating a general opinion will ensure clarity and precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

initial point of critique

Focuses on the starting point of a critical analysis, similar to the query but emphasizes the analytical aspect.

primary criticism

Highlights the main or most important criticism, differing by emphasizing the significance of the criticism.

opening salvo of criticism

Implies a forceful initial attack or objection, adding a sense of aggression not necessarily present in the original phrase.

first wave of critique

Suggests a series of criticisms coming in succession, differing in implying a larger, ongoing critical response.

initial critical assessment

Emphasizes the evaluative nature of the criticism, differing by specifying the act of assessing.

the crux of the criticism

Pinpoints the central or most crucial aspect of the criticism, focusing on the core issue.

main line of argument against

Frames the criticism as a central argument in opposition to something, changing the perspective to a debate or disagreement.

chief objection

Highlights the most significant reason for disagreement or disapproval, differing by focusing on the specific objection.

foremost disapproval

Indicates the most prominent expression of dislike or disagreement, differing by emphasizing the emotional aspect of disapproval.

basic critique

Denotes the fundamental or essential criticism, differing by suggesting a simpler or more foundational level of critique.

FAQs

How can I use "first line of criticism" in a sentence?

You can use "first line of criticism" to introduce an initial critique or objection to an idea or proposal. For example, "The first line of criticism against the new policy was its potential impact on small businesses."

What are some alternatives to "first line of criticism"?

Alternatives include "initial point of critique", "primary criticism", or "opening salvo of criticism" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "first line of criticism" a formal or informal expression?

"First line of criticism" can be used in both formal and neutral contexts, depending on the overall tone and audience. It is generally appropriate for academic papers, news articles, and professional discussions.

What makes "first line of criticism" effective in writing?

Using "first line of criticism" clearly signals the start of a structured critique, helping to organize arguments and guide readers. It is most effective when followed by specific evidence and analysis to support the criticism.