Sentence examples for first freedom to from inspiring English sources

It is the first freedom to die.

Writing in the era of the landmark 1947 Supreme Court case Everson v. Board of Education, which put the issue of indirect state support for parochial schools in the national spotlight, Parsons and Murray used the "first freedom" to enlist history as a safeguard to Catholic practice in an overwhelmingly Protestant nation.

"Pornography is the canary in the coal mine of free speech: it is the first freedom to die," he said.

By suddenly changing the finish line, the three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit disrupts the core First Amendment freedom to present a coherent political message to voters.

First, the freedom to dress the way one wants is not what's at stake here.

Of all the great and necessary freedoms listed in the First Amendment, freedom to exercise religion (not just to believe, but to live out that belief) is the most important; before freedom of speech, before freedom of the press, before freedom of assembly, before freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances, before all others.

The underlying problem with the Obama administration's mandate is that it violates one of our most cherished constitutional freedoms: the First Amendment freedom to adhere to sincere religious convictions without the government either compelling acts in violation of these beliefs or punishing adherence to them.

Now the corporations and malefactors of wealth exercise with zeal their First Amendment freedom to blast their political opponents into oblivion.

The court said the state was wrong to deny his claim, because his First Amendment freedom to practice religion was at stake: he wasn't skipping work to sleep in; his faith prevented him from working on sabbath.

Two of these gatherings were with conservatives and libertarians, explained Marc Solomon, political director of the group, who said the new effort is the first by Freedom to Marry to dedicated to conservatives.

Why should there be any restriction whatsoever - literal or threatened - on a subpoenaed party's exercise of his First Amendment freedom to disclose that a prosecutor wants something from him?