Fig. 6 FUR values at baseline and days 9, 23, 44, 65, and 86 in the second block of the study.
In the first block of the framework in Fig. 4, the studies generally adopted the approach of using the inventive output of universities/PRIs as proxy indicators to estimate their social and economic impact.
To study savings in particular, we compared the percentage of CRs between the first block of the acquisition experiment and the first block of the savings experiment.
The fourth block of the framework comprises studies that use economic indicators such as employment, income, output and GDP growth, as summarised in Table 6.
The depression-specific scale AD was included in the first block of covariates, the three GD scales in the second block and AA in the third block.
The second block of the control task was the length of 6 mini-blocks: 72 sec.
Finally, the third block of the Schandry task was conducted.
The first block of findings come from laboratory studies, using a dyadic setting in which one trained model demonstrates a specific behaviour and a single naïve individual (usually termed observer) is allowed to watch, and learn, from the demonstrations (Bugnyar & Huber, 1997; Campbell, Heyes, & Goldsmith, 1999; Galef, Manzig, & Field, 1986; Heyes & Dawson, 1990; Voelkl & Huber, 2000).
The first block of code, #1#, loads the data.
