fire was found

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fire was found" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where an investigation or search has revealed the presence of fire, such as in reports or news articles. Example: "During the investigation, it was confirmed that fire was found in multiple locations within the building."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

No evidence of fire was found.

The New York Times

But although no sign of fire was found, the 850-year-old building was evacuated as a precautionary measure.

The Guardian

The fire was found to have originated from a very high voltage power supply with no fuse.

The Guardian

_ No evidence at all of enemy fire was found at the scene _ no one was hit by enemy fire, nor was any government equipment struck.

The Washington Post

Paris prosecutor Remy Heitz said that an initial fire alert was sounded at 6 20pm on Monday evening but no fire was found.

The Guardian

Mr. Heitz said most people had been evacuated before the fire was found because a Mass had started in the cathedral.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

The carcasses of two dogs and two cats, burned in the fire, were found in the house.

The New York Times

Sawgrass areas that were void of cattail before the 1999 fire were found to have very similar percentages of cattail for the surface-burned (8 ± 7%) and non-burned (6 ± 9%) areas four years after the fire (Table3).

Ecological Processes

However, no corpses or traces of fire were found, implying that Romanovich took the towns' inhabitants to his own principality.

Wikipedia

A second gun, also recently fired, was found a short distance away.

Cornell University

The mechanical performance after firing was found to be always best for the self-flowing system, which is also less affected by changes in added-water content.

Ceramics International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting on incidents, use "fire was found" to clearly and concisely state the discovery of a fire, ensuring clarity and directness in your communication.

Common error

Avoid using "fire was found" excessively in contexts where the actor discovering the fire is relevant. Instead, specify who found the fire to provide more context and engagement, for example: "Firefighters found the fire" is more informative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fire was found" primarily functions as a statement of fact, indicating the discovery or identification of a fire. It typically appears in descriptive contexts, as confirmed by Ludwig, where the presence of fire is a relevant detail.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

53%

Science

35%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "fire was found" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to report the discovery of a fire. It's most prevalent in news and media, science, and wiki contexts. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase's utility and accuracy. While versatile, it's best practice to avoid overuse of the passive voice by specifying who found the fire when relevant. Alternatives such as "fire was detected" or "fire was discovered" can add nuance depending on the situation. Overall, "fire was found" serves as a clear and direct way to communicate the presence of fire in various situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fire was detected

Replaces "found" with "detected", emphasizing the use of sensors or systems to identify the fire.

fire was discovered

Substitutes "found" with "discovered", suggesting an accidental or unexpected finding.

the presence of fire was confirmed

Uses a more formal and descriptive structure to state that the existence of fire was verified.

a fire was located

Replaces "found" with "located", focusing on the geographical or spatial identification of the fire.

fire occurrence was identified

Emphasizes the event of the fire happening and being recognized.

the source of the fire was determined

Focuses on identifying the origin or cause of the fire, rather than just its presence.

investigation revealed a fire

Highlights the investigative process that led to the discovery of the fire.

traces of fire were uncovered

Suggests that evidence of a fire, rather than an active fire, was found.

evidence of a fire was located

Similar to 'traces of fire', but can also indicate an active fire's location.

authorities confirmed a fire

States that official sources have verified the existence of a fire.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "fire was found" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "the presence of fire was confirmed" or "investigation revealed a fire". These options offer a more sophisticated and less direct way to convey the same information.

What's the difference between "fire was found" and "fire was discovered"?

While both phrases are similar, "fire was found" implies a straightforward finding, whereas "fire was discovered" often suggests an element of surprise or unexpectedness in the finding.

Is it correct to say "fire was detected" instead of "fire was found"?

Yes, "fire was detected" is a correct and often preferred alternative, especially when referring to the use of alarms or sensors to identify the fire. It emphasizes the technological aspect of fire detection.

In what contexts is "fire was found" most commonly used?

"Fire was found" is commonly used in news reports, incident reports, and investigations to state the factual finding of a fire. It's a neutral and direct way to communicate this information, as Ludwig AI confirms.