Mitigating the negative effects of climate change-fire interactions would require actively exploiting favorable seasonal and inter-annual climate windows.
We concluded that physics-based simulations do reproduce reasonable and expected head- and back-fire interactions, but more work is needed to further understand the accuracy of such predictions.
GIS (Geographic Information System) technology has been applied in the model to analyze the distributions of the essential variables and support the modeling of human-fire interactions, which include human evacuation behaviors and fire gas hazards.
In this review, we synthesize climate change-fire interactions, discuss the impacts of uncertainty in a human-dominated landscape, and illuminate how both climate change projections and their uncertainties might impact our ability to manage forests in the Southeast.
Finally, we know little about the potential effects of a variety of biological and physical processes on climate-vegetation-fire interactions.
This new genre of rapid-fire interaction is further distributing the proverbial conversation and is evolving online interaction beyond the host site through syndication to other relevant networks and communities.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06444.024 Our analysis points towards suppression of seizure-like events as the mechanism by which moderate noise promotes grid firing, while interactions between noise and theta appear important for the capacity to multiplex grid firing with a wide range of gamma frequencies.
These data are consistent with suppression of seizure like events as the mechanism by which noise promotes grid firing, while interactions between noise and theta frequency inputs profoundly influence the dynamics of attractor networks that generate grid fields.
Useful results relevant to fire-structure interaction and the validation of simplified models, are presented.
Additionally, knowledge of space time patterns of fire-landscape interaction and landscape pattern regeneration provides useful baselines for future comparisons with responses to climate change.
