Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
These findings were validated with qRT-PCR using the validation cohort (N = 32) (Figure 2A and 2B).
Some of the numerical findings were validated experimentally.
These findings were validated through comparison with existing studies.
Findings were validated in data from the other sites.
These findings were validated against experimental data from this scale.
Findings were validated using data from the National Inpatient Survey (NIS, 2015).
The findings were validated with micro X-ray fluorescence (μXRF) imaging.
These findings were validated by first-principles calculations based on density functional theory.
Particle velocity and number findings were validated using image tracking and manual particle counting techniques respectively.
The experimental findings were validated by performing the 2-D, 3-D surface analysis on formulated models based on ANS.
Thus, the retrospectively calculated formulas were derived administering 75 g AA whereas in the prospective part these findings were validated administering 50 g AA.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com