Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(21)
All findings were categorized and placed into one of six common subgroups based on anatomic region.
Findings were categorized as normal or tracheal stenosis (<25%, 25%to50%0%, or >50%).
Even though the findings were categorized into three classes rather than two (M1 or M0), the interobserver agreement was very satisfactory.
A total of 21 articles were in the final review and the findings were categorized according to the area of tongue resection.
EEG findings were categorized according to the presence or absence of the following: (1) EEG-R, defined as a clear, reproducible change in either the background frequency or amplitude following repetitive auditory and nociceptive stimulations.
The findings were categorized into eight themes.
Similar(39)
Demographic, clinical, and biochemical findings are categorized as continuous or categorical variables.
A comprehensive literature review is first conducted and the findings are categorized.
Model verification should be performed to ensure accurate FEA; however, finite element models verified with clinical data such as a patient's computed tomography findings are categorized in a low level of validation or without validation.
The key findings are categorized and presented in the following sections: Two principal measures of corporate performance are profit rate and growth rate (Freel [2000]; Geroski and Machin [1992]; Wynarczyk and Thwaites [1996]).
How can the different possible unsolicited findings be categorized?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com