Exact(8)
DLBCL not otherwise specified (referred to henceforth as DLBCL) is a heterogeneous entity in terms of clinical presentation, genetic findings, response to therapy, and prognosis.
These analyses echoed the level-based findings: response time to targets revealed a main effect of group (F 1,33)=15.50, P<0.001, d=1.29), but neither a main effect of condition (F 1,33)=0.12, P=0.74) nor a condition by group interaction (F 1,33)=0.98, P=0.33; Figures 2a and b).
The purpose of this study is to report our experience with the risk factors, microbiological results, clinical findings, response to therapy, and the clinical outcome in patients with this rare disease.
The final diagnoses as determined by the treating clinicians as the charted discharge diagnosis (based on clinical presentation, laboratory studies, and chest film findings, response to treatment and ultrasound findings) of the enrolled patients are illustrated in Table 2.
The clinical features, radiological findings, response to treatment and outcome of PJP are reported to be widely different between the patients with or without AIDS [ 2, 3].
In major ways however, it seems to be unrelated with key aspects of the disease including clinical presentation, radiological findings, response to empirical antibiotic treatment and fatal outcomes.
Similar(52)
Moreover, in earlier findings, responses are studied for strongly coupled systems only and hence it is required to investigate the effectiveness of dampers and effects of asymmetry for torsionally flexible and torsionally stiff systems.
Contrary to our findings, responses to Env in RV 172 were not different between rAd5 alone and DNA prime – rAd5 boost groups [8].
Depending on the findings, response-enhancing strategies are developed and implemented in the waiting list control groups that subsequently enter the study.
No baseline differences were observed in demographic findings, responses to psychological questionnaires, or baseline pain measures (Table 1).
Based on clinical, microbiological, and radiographic findings, responses were labeled as partial or complete, stabilization of disease, or failure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com