Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
We did not perform a per-patient analysis (limited number of subjects), but only 28(8%) patients with a positive CTA + CTP finding were considered as false positive on the basis of the ICA finding.
Several explanations for this finding were considered (see [ 22] for an extensive discussion), but inclusion of client self-appraisal of risk and protective factors and care planning along SDM lines were considered to be strengths of the study [ 22].
Similar(58)
This finding is considered to be evidence for excitation of several TE modes.
The finding was considered so important that an article about it was made public ahead of schedule by the editors of The New England Journal of Medicine.
A statistically significant finding was considered p < 0.05.
This finding was considered in the specification of the continuation of caregiving function described below.
Because this finding was considered unrelated to underlying ocular inflammation, the patient was excluded from the statistical analysis.
This finding was considered further in a secondary, exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis.
All other clinical and microscopic findings were considered unremarkable.
These findings were considered to be fairly interesting by other experts in the field, but not totally surprising or groundbreaking.
Decision Time The analysts findings were considered so serious that officials convened a 7 a.m. meeting of high-level officials on Saturday.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com