Suggestions(5)
Exact(26)
This finding was interpreted to support the hypothesis that the birds had initially learned to respond to a relationship (what a human being would call the concept "darker") and that this response to a relationship had been transposed or transferred to the new discrimination.
This finding was interpreted as an absence of stress shielding, which is characteristically found in conventional stems [9].
This finding was interpreted in terms of buffering properties of the intermediate Ag layer, which prevent the deposited Co atoms from germanide formation.
This finding was interpreted in terms of the similar properties of cometary grains and particles forming the regolith in C-type asteroids (e.g., Chernova et al., 1993), which also seems to be consistent with the similar morphology of interplanetary dust particles originating from asteroids and comets (e.g., Brownlee, 1985).
This finding was interpreted to reflect a bacterial response to phenylphenol toxicity and it was argued that the upregulation of ribosomal protein genes might enhance the translation process or help proper ribosome functioning under stress conditions as the exposure to phenylphenol.
This finding was interpreted as a mechanism to down-regulate the immune response [42].
Similar(34)
This finding is interpreted as an enrichment of aluminum at the grain boundaries.
This finding is interpreted to result from the chemo-mechanical surface treatment of the sapphire sample.
This finding is interpreted in light of Pareto theory on tradeoffs between tasks.
This findings was interpreted as evidence of poor "low-end specificity" for the BDI [ 54].
How should these findings be interpreted?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com