Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The analysis on the frequency domain reveals the relationships between the main aES control parameters, the values of closed loop gain and dither amplitude, and the design performance indicators, the speed of search and accuracy of MPP finding, respectively.
There was a significant difference of the 50 years survival of conclusions according to the negative or positive finding, 72±12% (negative finding) and 40±3% (positive finding), respectively (P<0.0001) (Figure 4).
An E3 or E4 case was defined as a case in which the highest classified lesion by the reference standard was an E3 or E4 finding respectively.
Similar(57)
Thus, each method was evaluated independently without prior knowledge of the PET or CIM findings, respectively.
However, physical examination findings were more frequently overestimated (25%, 35.7%, and 25% for history, physical examination, and laboratory findings, respectively) and less frequently underestimated (37.5%, 21.4%, and 37.5% for history, physical examination, and laboratory findings, respectively).
Sensitivity and specificity are 0.87 and 0.95 for CRC detection, and 0.60 and 0.79 for non-malignant findings, respectively.
Moreover, the judgments were in opposite direction to the LRs in 2/20 (10%) and 2/10 (20%) of the positive and negative findings, respectively.
In their study of 400 patients, Wilmshurst et al. [12] found that 53% of patients with large shunts had migraine with aura, whereas only 25 and 4% of those with medium and small shunts had these findings, respectively.
Clinicians and laboratory staff were blinded for HPV test results and clinical findings, respectively.
Therefore, we applied two numerical scoring systems to objectively quantify clinical and neurological findings, respectively, at each experimental time point.
No further management was considered appropriate in 68% and 66% of cases of true- and false-negative findings, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com