Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

financed with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"financed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to signify that money from a certain source was used to pay for something. For example, "The new playground was financed with donations from the local community."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"That bakery was financed with our money.

News & Media

The Guardian

Some of the cost has been financed with federal loans.

News & Media

The New York Times

Often this has been financed with large borrowings.

News & Media

The Economist

The guide was financed with a grant from Western Union.

News & Media

The New York Times

The Watergate break-in was financed with secret campaign contributions.

This system is financed with donations from Kosovars in exile.

News & Media

The New York Times

They would have to be financed with borrowing.

News & Media

The New York Times

It is financed with proceeds from the state lottery.

News & Media

The New York Times

and "Finding Nemo" that were jointly financed with Disney.

News & Media

The New York Times

The health plan was financed with city and state money.

News & Media

The New York Times

Medicaid is financed with federal and state money.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "financed with", specify the source of the funding to provide clarity and context. For example, "The project was financed with government grants".

Common error

Do not use "financed with" without clearly stating what the funds were used for. For instance, instead of saying "The company was financed with investments", specify what aspects of the company were financed, such as "The company's expansion was financed with investments".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "financed with" functions as a verb phrase acting as a passive construction, indicating how something was paid for or resourced. It specifies the origin of the funds utilized. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase signifies money from a certain source was used to pay for something.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "financed with" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to describe the source of funding for a particular endeavor. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it effectively conveys that money from a specific origin was used for payment. Its usage spans across diverse contexts such as news reporting, scientific research, and formal business communications, making it versatile for various professional needs. While often interchangeable with "funded by", specifying the exact funding source adds clarity, a best practice emphasized in our writing guidance. Overall, "financed with" is a reliable choice for indicating financial backing, and this analysis provides a comprehensive guide to its effective use.

FAQs

How is "financed with" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "financed with" indicates the source of funds used for a particular purpose. For example, "The new school was financed with local taxes and private donations".

What are some alternatives to "financed with"?

You can use alternatives such as "funded by", "supported through", or "capitalized by" depending on the specific context.

Is it always necessary to specify the source of funding when using "financed with"?

While not always grammatically required, specifying the source of funding when using "financed with" provides clarity and helps the reader understand the context better. Omitting the source can sometimes lead to ambiguity.

What is the difference between "financed with" and "funded by"?

While the phrases "financed with" and "funded by" are often interchangeable, "financed with" can sometimes imply a broader range of financial activities, whereas "funded by" more directly points to the source of the money. However, in most contexts, they carry very similar meanings.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: