Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

final deviance

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "final deviance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the last instance of deviation from a norm or standard, often in fields like sociology, psychology, or statistics. Example: "The study concluded with an analysis of the final deviance observed in the participants' behavior during the experiment."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

final deviance.

In order to decide which model fits best, the final deviance can be taken into account.

The final deviance indicates the likelihood of the observed data to fit the assumptions of the estimated model.

The exclusion of this item led to a significant improvement in final deviance and favored the IRT model with 31 items (model with 32 items: final deviance dev = 18,085.76, np = 56; model with 31 items: dev = 17,344.36, np = 53; model comparison: Δ dev = 741.1, Δnp = 3, p < 0.001).

These indexes are given as follows: AIC = dev + 2 n p BIC = dev + log N · n p, where 'dev' represents the final deviance of the model, N the sample size, and np the number of parameters for model estimation.

Concerning the discriminant validity of the measures of the affective domain, the results in Table 3 indicate that in all dimensionalities, the PCM fits the data better than the RSM (cf. final deviance and information-based criteria).

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

In order to compare competing models, the information criteria and a χ2 likelihood ratio test of final deviances were used.

A χ2 likelihood ratio test of final deviances (dev) was applied to test for significant differences between the models.

Again, the faceted model with four correlated dimensions outperformed the single-factor approach, as the difference in the final deviances was statistically significant (Δ dev = 595.17, Δdf = 9, p < 0.001).

The final model had a deviance of 122.806 at 1001 degrees of freedom and a p-value of 1.000 against the FM.

Table 3 shows that the predictive utility of the models, from the baseline to the final, improved in both deviance (from LR χ =39.1, p<0.05, to LR χ 2=11.5, p<0.05) and accuracy (from 69.6 to 73.2%).

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing statistical models, clearly define what constitutes "deviance" in your specific context to avoid ambiguity. Specify the metric used to quantify it, such as residual deviance or model deviance.

Common error

Avoid using "final deviance" interchangeably with "variance." Deviance specifically refers to the difference between a fitted model and the saturated model, while variance measures the spread of data points around the mean. They are distinct concepts in statistical analysis.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "final deviance" functions as a noun phrase, typically used in statistical contexts to describe the deviance value of a model after all iterations or adjustments have been made. According to Ludwig AI, it indicates the likelihood of the observed data fitting the estimated model.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "final deviance" is a technical term primarily used in statistical modeling to assess the goodness-of-fit of a model. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates the likelihood of the observed data to fit the assumptions of the estimated model. Its use is prevalent in scientific contexts, particularly in academic papers and research reports. While the phrase is grammatically correct, it's crucial to understand its specific meaning within statistical analysis to avoid misinterpretations. Alternatives exist, but their suitability depends on the precise context. The phrase highlights the importance of quantitative assessment in model selection and evaluation.

FAQs

In statistical modeling, what does "final deviance" indicate?

The "final deviance" indicates the likelihood of the observed data to fit the assumptions of the estimated model. A smaller value generally suggests a better fit, as highlighted by Ludwig.

How can I use "final deviance" when comparing different statistical models?

The "final deviance" can be used, alongside information criteria like AIC and BIC, to compare how well different models fit the same data. Lower deviance, AIC, and BIC values often indicate a better model fit. A chi-square likelihood ratio test of final deviances can also test for significant differences between the models.

What's a good alternative to "final deviance" in scientific writing?

Depending on the specific context, alternatives like "ultimate error", "end-stage deviation", or "terminal divergence" can be used. These phrases emphasize different aspects of the concept.

How does "final deviance" relate to model selection?

"Final deviance" is a metric used in model selection to assess how well a statistical model fits the observed data. Models with lower final deviance are generally preferred, all other things being equal, as they indicate a better fit.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: