Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
A sensitive filter for randomised controlled trials was used.
A filter for randomised controlled trials was used.
For PubMed, this was combined with the Cochrane highly sensitive filter for randomised controlled trials.
Searches in Embase, Medline, PreMedline and PsycINFO were combined with a highly sensitive filter for randomised controlled trials.
On 20 December 2013 we searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase using pre-established search terms that consisted of three parts (strategies for eradication treatment, H pylori, and a specific filter for randomised controlled trials).
A specific search strategy was developed for each database using the Cochrane methodological filter for randomised controlled trials and MESH keywords, and other relevant terms such as 'fibromyalgia', 'chronic pain syndrome'healthlth status', 'multidisciplinary'patientent care team', 'back pain', all of which were exploded when necessary.
Similar(54)
The standard Scottish Intercollegiate Guidance Network (SIGN) filters for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), economic studies and observational studies [ 1] were combined to capture all study designs relevant to the study question.
The standard Scottish Intercollegiate Guidance Network (SIGN) filters for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), economic studies and observational studies [ 20] were combined to capture all study designs relevant to the study question.
Using the terms diabetes mellitus and aspirin and a filter highly sensitive for randomised controlled trials only, we searched Medline (1966-November 2008) for trials of people with diabetes who received aspirin.
Firstly, we filtered search returns for randomised controlled trials in Medline and Web of Science by using database specific filters.
We searched Medline and Embase from 1980 to June 2013, using the methodological filters proposed by the Cochrane Collaboration to search for randomised clinical trials (see supplementary appendix).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com